On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:14:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> writes:
> 
> >>>>> --- a/policy.sgml
> >>>>> +++ b/policy.sgml
> >>>>> @@ -1688,11 +1688,14 @@
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>         <p>
> >>>>>           The maintainer name and email address used in the changelog
> >>>>> -         should be the details of the person uploading <em>this</em>
> >>>>> -         version.  They are <em>not</em> necessarily those of the
> >>>>> -         usual package maintainer.<footnote>
> >>>>> -           If the developer uploading the package is not one of the 
> >>>>> usual
> >>>>> -           maintainers of the package (as listed in
> >>>>> +         should be the details of the person who prepared this release 
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> +         the package.  They are <em>not</em> necessarily those of the
> >>>>> +         uploader or usual package maintainer.<footnote>
> >>>>> +           In the case of a sponsored upload, the uploader signs the
> >>>>> +           files, but the changelog maintainer name and address are 
> >>>>> those
> >>>>> +           of the person who prepared this release.  If the preparer of
> >>>>> +           the release is not one of the usual maintainers of the 
> >>>>> package
> >>>>> +           (as listed in
> >>>>>             the <qref id="f-Maintainer"><tt>Maintainer</tt></qref>
> >>>>>             or <qref id="f-Uploaders"><tt>Uploaders</tt></qref> control
> >>>>>             fields of the package), the first line of the changelog is
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Russ, should I apply your patch even after Dimitri comment about
> > sponsored NMU ?
> 
> Yes, I still think the above patch is correct and reflects the prevailing
> practice in how to handle the changelog signature.  Some people advocate
> doing other things, but that's always the case for anything like this in
> Debian, and I think this wording is better than the current wording and
> closer to what people are actually doing.
> 
> I think there's enough wiggle room in "the person who prepared this
> release" for people to use their own judgement and change the trailer if
> they feel that's appropriate, while still pushing people gently towards
> what seems to be the prevailing practice.

Applied, thanks for your confirmation.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140802204454.GA7531@yellowpig

Reply via email to