Le 15/07/2014 16:22, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> Could you please write the definition for each of them, and determine whether
> java1-runtime and java2-runtime should be kept ?
Hi Bill,
Here is the definition of these packages:
java5-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 5
java6-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 6
java7-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 7
java8-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 8
java9-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 9
java5-runtime-headless a non graphical Java runtime environment, Java
version 5
java6-runtime-headless a non graphical Java runtime environment, Java
version 6
java7-runtime-headless a non graphical Java runtime environment, Java
version 7
java8-runtime-headless a non graphical Java runtime environment, Java
version 8
java9-runtime-headless a non graphical Java runtime environment, Java
version 9
java1-runtime and java2-runtime are still provided by gcj-jre and
openjdk-{6,7,8} but they are obsolete. We remove them from the
dependencies as we update the packages.
java9-runtime isn't used yet but is likely to appear in Jessie+1,
feel free to remove it if you prefer keeping only the packages currently
used.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c5414e.1020...@apache.org
