On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:11:24AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Alessio, > > Alessio Treglia wrote: > > > So, here is my proposal (which I've already posted on debian-devel): > [...] > > + lv2-host anything that can host LV2 audio plugins > > + lv2-plugin an LV2 compliant audio plugin > > Vincent Danjean wrote: > > Le 21/11/2012 17:48, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > >> What I'm missing is why it's useful to list lv2 hosts in the Depends > >> like this. The user will end up with one selected essentially at > >> random. Is that desirable ? > > > > Usually, the Enhances: relationship is a better one than a Depends:/ > > Recommends:/Suggests: in plugin packages. > > Russ Allbery wrote: > > > We have a bunch of > > existing virtual packages that aren't really useful because they don't > > offer any sort of guaranteed interface, and therefore cannot be > > meaningfully used in package relationships (which is the whole point of a > > virtual package). > > Thanks for writing. Any news? Are you still interested in adding > this virtual package?
Are you still interested in pursuing this ? Otherwise, if nobody object, I will close this bug in one week. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140519171413.GA19417@yellowpig
