On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 06:56:13PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 20.03.2014 23:58, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:39:17AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:39:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >>> So, I propse adding to the list of exceptions in policy section 9.1.1:
> >>>
> >>>    The FHS requirement that architecture-independent application-specific
> >>>    static files be located in /usr/share is relaxed to a suggestion.
> >>>
> >>>    In particular, a subdirectory of /usr/lib may be used by a package
> >>>    (or a collection of packages) to hold a mixture of 
> >>> architecture-independent
> >>>    and architecture-dependent files. However, when a directory is
> >>>    entirely composed of architecture-independent files, it should be
> >>>    located in /usr/share.
> >>
> >> Seconded.
> > 
> > So I have created a branch 'bug741304-bill' with this change.
> > Please check the diff (in attachment).
> 
> lgtm, thanks

I have merged this branch. Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140501204249.GA19370@yellowpig

Reply via email to