Ximin Luo <infini...@gmx.com> writes: > It depends on what you consider as "part of the build process". Now that > you are deprecating the "patch" target, I would argue that "ready to > build" and "ready to modify" are the same thing - since `dpkg-source > --before-build` applies the patches, which is also what you want to be > able to modify the sources.
> Do you have some counter-examples? Not off-hand, but they are definitely not the same thing. There are still packages that use format 1.0 and separate patch systems. While that may be deprecated, it's still supported, and I expect it to be supported for quite some time into the future. > I'd like to suggest the additional requirement for debian/rules targets > to assume that all patches have been applied. There was extensive discussion of this on debian-devel, and the short answer is that the project does not have consensus to make this change. I also don't think that this is a fight worth having right now. Some people are very insistent on continuing to use more complex build systems in conjunction with the 1.0 package format (and the 3.0 (quilt) format does have some weird corner cases that make some things harder to understand). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ppqorq5a....@windlord.stanford.edu
