On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:58:03AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I think configuration files should also be included in the first list, > > because the > > user is supposed to be able to interact dirrectly with them. > > I object to this extension of the proposal, because use of UTF-8 > characters in conffile names is a current use case of ca-certificates. > If anything it could be treated as a "should" and turned into "must" > after working with the ca-certificates maintainers on a solution.
Why files in ca-certificates are configuration files in the first place ? I doubt users are expected to edit PEM certificate. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130414122247.GD1942@yellowpig
