Hello everybody, the patch below was seconded by Russ and Guillem, and the discusssion about documenting udebs was moved to http://bugs.debian.org/698030, so I think I will apply the patch soon unless one reminds me a good reason for not doing so.
Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Le Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 03:29:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > here is a new version trying to addres Simon's and Guillem's comments. > > @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ Package: libc6 > <item><qref id="f-Description"><tt>Description</tt></qref> > (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Homepage"><tt>Homepage</tt></qref></item> > <item><qref id="built-using"><tt>Built-Using</tt></qref></item> > + <item><qref > id="f-Package-Type"><tt>Package-Type</tt></qref></item> > </list> > </p> > > @@ -2751,6 +2752,7 @@ Package: libc6 > <item><qref id="f-VCS-fields"><tt>Vcs-Browser</tt>, > <tt>Vcs-Git</tt>, et al.</qre > <item><qref > id="f-Standards-Version"><tt>Standards-Version</tt></qref> (recommend > <item><qref id="sourcebinarydeps"><tt>Build-Depends</tt> et > al</qref></item> > + <item><qref id="f-Package-List"><tt>Package-List</tt></qref> > (recommended)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Checksums"><tt>Checksums-Sha1</tt> > and <tt>Checksums-Sha256</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item> > <item><qref id="f-Files"><tt>Files</tt></qref> (mandatory)</item> > @@ -3801,6 +3803,34 @@ Checksums-Sha256: > </taglist> > </p> > </sect1> > + > + <sect1 id="f-Package-List"> > + <heading><tt>Package-List</tt></heading> > + > + <p> > + Multiline field listing all the packages that can be built from > + the source package, considering every architecture. The first > line > + of the field value is empty. Each one of the next lines describes > + one binary package, by listing its name, type, section and > priority > + separated by spaces. Fifth and subsequent space-separated items > + may be present and parsers must allow them. See the > + <qref id="f-Package-Type">Package-Type</qref> field for a list of > + package types. > + </p> > + </sect1> > + > + <sect1 id="f-Package-Type"> > + <heading><tt>Package-Type</tt></heading> > + > + <p> > + Simple field containing a word indicating the type of package: > + <tt>deb</tt> for binary packages and <tt>udeb</tt> for micro > binary > + packages. Other types not defined here may be indicated. In > + source package control files, the <tt>Package-Type</tt> field > + should be omitted instead of giving it a value of <tt>deb</tt>, as > + this value is assumed for paragraphs lacking this field. > + </p> > + </sect1> > </sect> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130112062913.ga31...@falafel.plessy.net -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130216033640.gd7...@falafel.plessy.net
