Jakub Wilk dixit: > * Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org>, 2012-11-25, 15:53: >>>> Nothing in policy forbids using -j if parallel *isn't* set; it only >>>> specifies behaviour when parallel is set. >>> Hmm. Not in the wording, but that’s why I said that’s my reading. >> To clarify, I think this would be a reasonable thing to suggest as a policy >> amendment; I might well even support it ... > > See bug #663762.
Ah, thanks. Cc’ing that bug, with my +1 for defaulting to one job (see #694282 for a slightly longer reasoning; basically, I might want to run more than one build, or do other things in parallel, or have a RAM-constrained machine). bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1211261732490.23...@herc.mirbsd.org
