Steve Langasek wrote: > If I understand the policy process correctly, the N=3 requirement for > patches includes the submitter; so with two other seconds, I think this is > ready to go.
There was an objection from Michael Biebl and quite a bit of discussion after those seconds which touched on important issues, and I do not remember if the patch addressed them. Would it be a bad idea to refresh our memories by reposting the patch? Sorry for the fuss, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827181053.GA335@mannheim-rule.local
