Hi Paul,
thank for your patience. I think that the patch you sent nicely enhances
the chapter 5.13.
On the typograhy side, it is very minor, but since you added a bullet point to
the list in 5.13.2, you can make the now previous bullet point finish by a
semicolon (see below), and the last bullet point finishing by a dot.
Have a nice day,
-- Charles
Le Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:16:21PM +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Index: pkgs.dbk
> ===================================================================
> --- pkgs.dbk (revision 9236)
> +++ pkgs.dbk (working copy)
> @@ -2386,9 +2386,7 @@
> The package must have been available in <literal>unstable</literal> for 2, 5
> or 10 days, depending on the urgency (high, medium or low). Please note that
> the urgency is sticky, meaning that the highest urgency uploaded since the
> -previous <literal>testing</literal> transition is taken into account. Those
> -delays may be doubled during a freeze, or <literal>testing</literal>
> -transitions may be switched off altogether;
> +previous <literal>testing</literal> transition is taken into account;
> </para>
> </listitem>
> <listitem>
> @@ -2419,6 +2417,12 @@
> all the necessary criteria).
^
> </para>
> </listitem>
> +<listitem>
> +<para>
> +The phase of the project. I.e. automatic transitions are turned off during
> +the <literal>freeze</literal> of the <literal>testing</literal> distribution;
^
> +</para>
> +</listitem>
> </itemizedlist>
> <para>
> To find out whether a package is progressing into <literal>testing</literal>
> @@ -2628,10 +2632,11 @@
> The packages are looked at to determine whether they are valid candidates.
> This gives the update excuses. The most common reasons why a package is not
> considered are too young, RC-bugginess, and out of date on some arches. For
> -this part of britney, the release managers have hammers of various sizes to
> -force britney to consider a package. (Also, the base freeze is coded in that
> -part of britney.) (There is a similar thing for binary-only updates, but this
> -is not described here. If you're interested in that, please peruse the
> code.)
> +this part of britney, the release managers have hammers of various sizes,
> +called hints (see below), to force britney to consider a package. (Also, the
> +base freeze is coded in that part of britney.) (There is a similar thing for
> +binary-only updates, but this is not described here. If you're interested in
> +that, please peruse the code.)
> </para>
> <para>
> Now, the more complex part happens: Britney tries to update
> <literal>testing</literal>
> @@ -2649,7 +2654,13 @@
> </para>
> <para>
> The hints are available via <ulink
> -url="http://&ftp-master-host;/testing/hints/";></ulink>.
> +url="http://&ftp-master-host;/testing/hints/";></ulink>, where you can find
> +the
> +<ulink
> url="http://&ftp-master-host;/testing/hints/README";>description</ulink>
> +as well. With the hints, the Debian Release team can block or unblock
> +packages, ease or force packages into <literal>testing</literal>, remove
> +packages from <literal>testing</literal>, approve uploads to
> +<link linkend="t-p-u">testing-proposed-updates</link> or override the
> urgency.
> </para>
> </section>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120704235853.gb31...@falafel.plessy.net
