Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > Here is an updated patch that tries to remedy those concerns. The > requirement for /run and /run/lock is a separate point in the FHS > exception list, and a new section under 9.1 has been added to spell out > explicitly, for everyone, the requirements on packages that make use of > those directories. The init.d language has been streamlined somewhat > and a reference to that new section added.
> Note that this version of the patch explicitly says that packages > "should" use /run and /run/lock in preference to /var/run and /var/lock. > My understanding is that this is where we want to go, but if this is > premature, that paragraph can easily be removed for now without changing > the substance of the rest of this change. This patch, minus the should statement about /run and /run/lock, has been merged for the next release. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h0vbjtp....@windlord.stanford.edu
