Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> writes:
> Regarding the formulation, your suggestion does fix the issue Hendrik
> identified. I would still remind that the term "command" is ambiguous
> (you must be referring to simple commands here).
I'm not sure how else to word it. I tried to resolve that ambiguity, but
apparently wasn't successful.
> Also, I suggest to make the policy as implementation-independent as
> possible, ideally avoiding to force usage of exec.
But that matters for interoperability. The point of this section is to be
able to issue the command:
x-terminal-emulator -e vi 'some file'
and know that it works. If you don't use exec, it won't.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obux1p6c....@windlord.stanford.edu
