Hi, I wrote:
> You didn't introduce it, but I think the phrase starting with > "similarly to" here is problematic, since it makes the spec harder for > people outside Debian to understand and use, without adding much > clarity to compensate for that. Could we remove it? [... and another wording suggestion ...] I think the meaning conveyed in your original patch is correct already, so if anyone was waiting for the nitpicking to end, please just consider Charles's version. Thanks for your work and sorry for the distraction. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111212013321.ga24...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net
