On 21/11/11 23:21, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Ximin Luo wrote: > >> When packaging mozilla extensions I ran some problems with DEP5. I talked >> this >> issue over on #645696 which eventually resulted in encouragement to move >> forward >> with a proposal for a change to be made. > > I think this report contains multiple proposals. Let me try to > summarize (and please correct me where I go wrong). > > First, the problem being addressed: a debian/copyright file like this: > > Files: * > Copyright: yyyy-yyyy etc > License: GPL-2+ > > License: GPL-2 > etc > > or this: > > Files: * > Copyright: yyyy-yyyy etc > License: GPL-2 with Font exception > > License: GPL-2 > etc > > is not considered valid because there is no "License: GPL-2+" > or "License: GPL-2 with Font exception" paragraph. Right?
Correct, and that's the symptom that I first came across, but I think all of the symptoms that I described in the latter half of my last email, are part of the same design problem. X -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0 https://bitbucket.org/infinity0 https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
