The package maintainer wants the following stanza
Copyright: (C) 1995-1998, 2000, 2003-2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License: GFDL-1.1+ Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. . On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.2 can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL-1.2'. If it were me I would have them match. > So to be clear, the claim here is that it's ok to list "License: LGPL-2+" > (or something of the sort), but have the license stanza contain the text of > LGPL-3? Or if that's not what you mean, could you please provide a concrete > example of the usage at issue? > -- Nicholas Bamber | http://www.periapt.co.uk/ PGP key 3BFFE73C from pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e20956d.1070...@periapt.co.uk
