On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:58:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 13:49:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Currently, section 9.1.1 relaxes the FHS requirement that /lib64 and > > /usr/lib64 be used, but it doesn't prohibit installing files in that > > location. However, due to the way Debian handles this (with symlinks), > > bad things happen in terms of tracking files and conflicts if packages > > install files into /lib64 and /usr/lib64 and rely on these symlinks. > > I think we should instead prohibit (must not) installing files into > > /lib64 and /usr/lib64 in packages with architecture amd64. > Sounds sensible to me. I agree. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
