On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 06:57:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:22:46PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit : > > > > Yes. If a maintainer is taking more that for a *RC* bug fix, then they > > *should* keep the buglog updated with status. > > Talking about the GCC 4.6 “*RC bugs*”, I got one other report telling that > Debian's GCC 4.6.1 will introduce more failures. Then why do we need to act > in > emergency and fix all the 4.6.0 bugs within 7 days ? Can't you tolerate us to > collate both transitions, without having to put placeholders bugs in the BTS ? >
No. You don't need to fix all the bugs in 7 days, you need to at least respond to it though. > I still do not understand why pressure is given to answer in 7 days, which is > at most one full week-end, for non-urgent issues. These are RC bugs. They're urgent issues. As for why doing this at all, please see (again) the URL I pointed to above. Neil -- < wjt> THINK OF THE TREES < rjek> ... THAT WE BURNT TO MAKE THE ELECTRONS TO SEND THIS EMAIL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504094018.gc...@feta.halon.org.uk
