Hi,

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:25:31AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
> 
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> 
> > By extracting attached file into source and running "make", it will do
> > the magic of converting to DocBok XML and then to PDF etc.
> > (Need the sid version of the latest debiandoc-sgml)
> 
> Very neat.  I also had to install dblatex.  I like the separation
> between automated conversion and patches to fix it up.  Some quick
> reactions:
> 
> . The generated HTML refers to some missing files like
>   "images/prev.gif".  I assume "make publish" would have taken care of
>   that; maybe it would be possible for a similar target to take care
>   of putting a symlink or copy of the images/ dir in the source tree
>   for easy previewing.

I was lazy to copy that kind of script to the makefile.  You can find it
in maint-guide subversion.  This bug report was a reminder and promting
for me to cordinate this conversion with people in charge of publishing
policy.  This is to show this conversion is possible with minimal
transtion work.
 
> . The lack of indentation in the source is nice.  Less fussy.

That is not my intention.  XML makes no distinction.  I think it may be
good idea to run some kind of lint program on XML source.

> . That said, if there were a way to preserve the whitespace of the
>   original and just substitute tags (so diff-ing between the before
>   and after would be possible), that would be even better.  I
>   understand that's probably impossible.  I fell back to using "git
>   diff --no-index --word-diff=color" to find meaningful differences.

If you want to do this, conversion needs to be done differently with
much more manual works.

> . Sometimes the spacing around closing tags looks unidiomatic, as in
> 
>       ... The detailed
>       procedure for gracefully orphaning a package can be found in the Debian
>       Developer's Reference (see <xref linkend="related"/> ).  </para> 
> </footnote>

I noticed this while working on maint-guide conversion.  Bug filed.

>   The extra space carries over to the rendered HTML, too.  Is that
>   intentional?

No.

> . Quotation marks were lost, for example in “Originally called "Debian
>   GNU/Linux Policy Manual", ...” at the start of the policy manual.

I was wondering on the same problem on maint-guide conversion.  Bug
filed.

> . Aside from the quotation marks and spaces, I couldn't find any
>   artifacts.  Seems like a good conversion.

I am busy fixing maint-guide now.   Please let me know how I get changes
commited.  Access to git branch will be nice.

Osamu
 
> Thanks much; nicely done.
> Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110425141447.ga3...@debian.org

Reply via email to