On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:49:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I was just looking at the incoming version of policy, and it occurred to > > me: is there any particular reason why there still needs to be a section > > in policy for "The OSF/Motif and OpenMotif libraries"? It defines the > > circumstances under which packages compiled against non-free Motif > > should be given names with -smotif or -dmotif suffixes; but the last > > such package left in the archive vanished or switched to LessTif > > somewhere around about Sarge. The only remaining rdeps of libmotif4 > > that I can see anywhere in Debian are the other members of the openmotif > > source package.
> Yeah, this whole section looks completely obsolete. I think we should > just remove it entirely. Objections or seconds? Seconded. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
