Le Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:51:58AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > I hope some other people will comment and help get this > improved. But the way you framed this initial discussion doesn't make it > welcoming for other people to chime in...
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:14:19 +0100, you wrote: In the absence of objections, I will commit this sometimes next week. On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:20:42 +0900, I wrote: I waited a week to let others give more positive comments first. But since there are no comments, I will give mine. So I have not stopped the discussion. I waited for the very last minute that you gave to people for commenting. I think that the Developers References should not be changed if there is not at least one positive agreement to the change. Next time, give more time for others to comment. There is no emergency that justifies a one week deadline. Also, I welcome positive apperciations of your patch, I gave my opinion already, and do not have more to add. I will not argue with anybody writing that your patch is good and can be applied. And yes, my answer was as displeasing as your hidden call to the DPL. I regret that I got dragged in giving more explanations. I should have limited myself to say that I think that it is inappropriate, as it was inappropriate to make things personnal in Message #52. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110312122133.gb20...@merveille.plessy.net
