On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > * Make section "4.4.6. chroots to different distributions" be 4.4.1, > since the existence and use of porterboxes is probably something fewer > people are familiar with
That entire section looks horribly out of date anyway. I find the promise of backing up user data particularly dangerous. Or funny. And people isn't in the US anyway. > * rename it from "chroots to different distributions" to "porterboxes > provide chroots to different distributions" It doesn't provide different distributions at all. All it does is debian. We usually have different suites of that tho. > * link to http://dsa.debian.org/doc/install-req/ and explain why people > might want to install packages in a chroot erm. what's there to explain. > * https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi will be changed so that, above the > "summary", this text appears: "Read more about the Debian Machines in the > Developer's Reference." It will link to > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/resources.html#server-machines Should the dev-ref ever be less wrong I won't mind adding a link to it. > By doing that, we define the term "porterbox", too, which is nice. Cheers, weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101020140209.gk19...@anguilla.noreply.org
