Okay, here's new proposed wording that incorporates some of the discussion
on this bug along with my personal opinion on the best wording. How does
this look to everyone?
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 642f672..314d5d0 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -1688,11 +1688,14 @@
<p>
The maintainer name and email address used in the changelog
- should be the details of the person uploading <em>this</em>
- version. They are <em>not</em> necessarily those of the
- usual package maintainer.<footnote>
- If the developer uploading the package is not one of the usual
- maintainers of the package (as listed in
+ should be the details of the person who prepared this release of
+ the package. They are <em>not</em> necessarily those of the
+ uploader or usual package maintainer.<footnote>
+ In the case of a sponsored upload, the uploader signs the
+ files, but the changelog maintainer name and address are those
+ of the person who prepared this release. If the preparer of
+ the release is not one of the usual maintainers of the package
+ (as listed in
the <qref id="f-Maintainer"><tt>Maintainer</tt></qref>
or <qref id="f-Uploaders"><tt>Uploaders</tt></qref> control
fields of the package), the first line of the changelog is
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ocbuz831.fsf...@windlord.stanford.edu
