Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes: > Where does policy define the concept of 'non-default alternative' for > dependencies ?
Good point. I think this should be more explicit, not just for this but because it's a common topic elsewhere (such as with the default MTA) and is something packagers should keep in mind when writing alternative dependencies. I've just filed a new bug against Policy for this discussion, since it's somewhat independent. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrshvqh4....@windlord.stanford.edu
