On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 17:43:09 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > So there are three or four things above that we could leave off. Would > people like me to try to trim the checklist down by removing things like > shlibs.local that probably no one is using? > Actually there are packages using shlibs.local, so I think this part should stay in the checklist. Overall it doesn't seem worth it to trim it.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
