Le Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 07:57:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > Maybe "maintainer in Debian"? Or "maintainer for Debian"?
Le Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:11:27PM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit : > > How about: > > Every package must have a maintainer. The maintainer must be a > member of the Debian project. I think that ‘Every package must have a maintainer for the Debian project’ would be the most accurate: - It underlines that the upstream maintainer is not enough if he does not actually the package itself for Debian (providing a debian directory is not enough) - It allows packages to be maintained by non-members. - It takes into account the packages in the contrib and non-free areas, that are not part of the Debian OS. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100705032050.gc30...@kunpuu.plessy.org
