gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> writes: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:03:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Certainly if the license becomes more broadly used in the future, it >> can be proposed for inclusion again at that time. > Some clear criterion might be helpful (and save you some time in the > future :)) It's a much stronger justification if the usage hits the level of the least-frequently-used license family already in common-licenses, which at the moment puts the bar around 850 packages. Among the things that could change that to move the bar lower would be use as the license of very widely-installed packages. So, for instance, if the license of perl-base were ever changed to be the Artistic 2.0 license, I think you should propose again at that time to include it. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sk4ulcza....@windlord.stanford.edu
