Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > Le Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:45:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> As discussed in that thread, the best path for a contentious point like >> this with good arguments on both sides would be to go through the >> Technical Committee, which is designed to be able to make decisions >> like that. >> I'd like to dispose of this bug one way or another, either by reclosing >> it or by appealing it to the Technical Committee. Which direction >> would you like to go with it at this point? > I agree that there is no consensus. For my packages, I have stopped > removing extensions because I do not want to take the risk to break > users scripts. I would like to appeal to the Technical Committee, but I > am about to take holidays, so it would be rather at the end of June. > But my experience of “after the holidays” plans is that my mailbox will > be full of other issues that will be equally hungry for my time. How > about closing the bug for the moment? When appealing to the TC, I will > take care of unarchiving, reopening, and reassigning. That sounds good to me. Thanks! Closing with this message. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eigmbw41....@windlord.stanford.edu
