Thibaut Paumard <paum...@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > there is a growing body of packages (or at least files) under [1]CeCILL > license in the archive. The CeCILL licenses are wordy and the project > would benefit from having them in /usr/share/common-licenses.
> [1] http://www.cecill.info/licences.en.html As revealed in subsequent discussion when this bug was originally filed, the number of packages using CeCILL licenses is fairly small (under 20 at the last survey), and there are multiple different forms of the license, so each license is used only a handful of times. While we've never set a firm numeric limit for license consideration in common-licenses, the general feeling is that it should be at least a couple of hundred, so this seems to be well short. I'm accordingly marking this Policy bug as rejected. It will remain open for some time in case anyone has any objections or disagrees with this analysis. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87typjs4lt....@windlord.stanford.edu
