Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> writes:

> Alternatively, we could try to improve the current status a little bit
> for squeeze.

> (A system admin with about 45000 users in his system asked me about
> the new /etc/profile and the apparently arbitrary limit of 29999).

> The block 30000-59999 is reserved *by us*, so we can free it for user
> accounts easily:

> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5849,7 +5849,7 @@
>               </p>
>             </item>
>  
> -           <tag>1000-29999:</tag>
> +           <tag>1000-59999:</tag>
>             <item>
>               <p>
>                 Dynamically allocated user accounts.  By default
> @@ -5860,11 +5860,6 @@
>               </p>
>             </item>
>  
> -           <tag>30000-59999:</tag>
> -           <item>
> -             <p>Reserved.</p>
> -           </item>
> -
>             <tag>60000-64999:</tag>
>             <item>
>               <p>

> Known affected packages: adduser, base-files
> Fix: Trivial: s/29999/59999/

> I'm looking for seconds for this proposal.

Seconded.  I agree with just releasing this UID space.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mxvtf7ar....@windlord.stanford.edu

Reply via email to