Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> writes: > But someone really should be writing this up, since the bug > report was, in my opinion, on point: this stuff needs to be written up, > and I think that the wiki stuff is already not as good as the README is > when it comes to git process (far too many needless merges in that > process). If someone is willing to write this up and maintain it in > debiandoc, great. Or else perhaps one could reconsider my offer to > maintain it in the current form.
I'm fine to maintain it in org-mode. I haven't played with it yet, but I'm sure it can't be that hard, and it's not like the details change all that much. I think we're likely to move to Docbook in the long run, and when we do that, we can look at rewriting it, but until then, I'm happy to use whatever format whoever did the original work thinks is easiest to maintain. I probably would have used POD. :) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org