On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:40:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Debian Policy has a more formal process than developers-reference and > I am concerned that mixing both discussions on the same channel would cause > confusion. > > debian-de...@l.d.o could be a better channel for the developers-reference > discussions, though with the downside of yet more outside traffic than > debian-policy.
The whole point of moving the devref to -policy@ was so that policy amendments that belong more in the devref (and vice versa) could easily be redirected. That advantage is lost if devref discussions were to be moved to -de...@. If you fear there will be confusion, it's probably best to make some minor changes to the devref process so that there will not be confusion. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
