On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> - Ability to recognize and render the following logical entities, in
>> decreasing order of importance:
>> + unordered lists
>> + ordered lists
>
> really needed?
I would think these are the guts of this proposal. Or else what
are we discussing here?
>
>> + emphasis
>> + strong emphasis
>> + definition lists
>> + hypertext links
>> + underlines, and strike throughs
>
> I don't think they are needed.
Why not? If rendering a description in a manner that makes it
easier to read is the goal, I fail to see why emphasis and strong
emphasis is a bad idea (think of text-to-speech mechanisms). This is
not just opinions we are discussing here, we should be looking at use
cases for marking up a textual description.
> Underlines is generally bad, strike throughs are worse ;-)
So you say. Don't use them, then. There are cases where either
one of these constructs have value; and you should not impose your
personal aesthetics on a general policy discussion.
> Ev. also monospace, e.g. for commands, but I really prefer to have
> a simpler language as possible.
>
>> At this point, I would say that Markdown/Resstructued text meets
>> most of the goals above, as long as we restrict the markup to the list
>> above:
>
> Could provide us an example of Resstructued for the basic constructs?
>> * unordered lists
>> * ordered lists
>> * emphasis
>> * strong emphasis
>> * definition lists
>> * hypertext links
>> * underlines, and strike throughs
>
> I like also creole (standardized wiki language, moinmoin support it),
> but no definition lists, underline, strike throughs.
What kind of language bindings are present for creole libraries?
markdown has a shell interpreter, has python, perl, ruby, C, c++, lisp,
and is widely supported and used by wikis et al.
> So for creole:
>
> * unordered lists \n * \n **
This fails the "Do not impact large numbers of packages" test,
since we have lots of packages using + and -. for list items.
> * ordered lists \n # \n ##
> * emphasis //foo//
This also fails the test above -- lots of people are using
*emphasis*.
> * strong emphasis **bar**
> * definition lists missing ev. \n **spam** is spam
Hmm
> * hypertext links normal url
> * underlines, and strike throughs missing, missing
ok.
manoj
--
There's just something I don't like about Virginia; the state.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
