Adeodato Simó dixit:
>+ Thorsten Glaser (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:54:59 +0000):
>
>> Except the ton which sets LC_ALL=C to get sane (parsable,
>> dependable, historically compatible) output.
>
>> These would then unset all other LC_* and LANG and LANGUAGE,
>> and only set LC_CTYPE to C.UTF-8 to get "old" behaviour but
>> with UTF-8 (and mbrtowc and iswctype and and and) available.
>
>Isn’t setting LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 going to be about the same and less work?
Indeed.
>I’m genuinely interested if that would behave any different to what you
>said (unsetting all, setting LC_CTYPE).
For my proposed C.UTF-8 "locale" it would be exactly zero, nada,
difference. (For en_US.UTF-8 it is a lot of difference, for example
sorting order.)
Unfortunately, GNU libc needs a locale to even enable UTF-8 support.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
