On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:55 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Packages that are essential or that are dependencies of essential
> packages may fall back on another prompting method if no such
> interface is available when they are executed.
Since we're essentially saying that all packages must support debconf,
why bother restricting the set of packages which are allowed to provide
a fallback?
>From a maintainer's POV surely they will only be working to provide a
fallback if they desire their package to be installable when debconf is
not available. I don't think we should second-guess their reasons for
doing so.
Our motivation here should be simply to ensure that all packages support
debconf (or a future replacement), not to over-control what they can do
in addition to that.
Cheers,
Andrew.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64(272)DEBIAN
Your true value depends entirely on what you are compared with.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
