On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:43:49PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 02 février 2009, vers 20:25,
> Lionel Elie Mamane <lio...@mamane.lu> disait :
>
> > Context: bug#513898
>
> > There seem to be a few packages that install non-english documentation
> > in /usr/share/doc/LANG/${ll}/${pkgname}
>
> > where ${ll} is the two-letter language code and ${pkgname} the package
> > name. But it - by far - is not all packages that provide non-english
> > documentation.
>
> > I cannot find anything about /usr/share/doc/LANG/ in policy, nor in
> > its upgrade-checklist, so I'm unsure where this comes from and what I
> > should do about it. Do we consider it a bug to ship documentation in
> > this directory? IMHO, we should either ship all non-english
> > documentation in /u/s/d/LANG/$ll or none...
>
> I would consider /usr/share/doc/$[pkgname}/${ll} a better choice. If the
> language is not available, you can easily get the documentation in
> English.
I agree. '/usr/share/doc/LANG' is awkward by itself: this seems an
attempt to be in /usr/share/doc while avoiding nameclash with packages.
But this is totally useless without a published policy to direct the
reader there. If someone see a need for a policy for location of localized
document, they should propose it (here and for the FHS), but until that
time I would says that using /usr/share/doc/LANG is a bug.
Here the list of packages in sid that use /usr/share/doc/LANG.
doc-debian-fr
doc-debian-uk
doc-linux-fr-html
doc-linux-fr-text
ifrench
ifrench-gut
xtel
(doc-debian-es does not use /usr/share/doc/LANG)
Cheers
--
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
