Your message dated Thu, 25 Dec 2008 12:40:39 -0600
with message-id <87ocz0qes8....@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
and subject line It is premature to propose this as a policy
has caused the Debian Bug report #250102,
regarding sometimes hard to figure out what package put files in /etc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
250102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=250102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: general
Severity: minor
No package lists /etc/xml, though there is stuff there:
$ dlocate /etc/xml|wc -l
0
$ ls /etc/xml
catalog docbook-xml.xml.old scrollkeeper.xml sgml-data.xml.old
catalog.old docbook-xsl.xml scrollkeeper.xml.old xml-core.xml
docbook-xml.xml docbook-xsl.xml.old sgml-data.xml xml-core.xml.old
Maybe you could clone reassign to the packages to blame, if any.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
Firstly, we need to make the tools and front-ends deal with
with registering optional files that might be created and/or shared
between multiple packages should be put in place. and been tested out
by having a few packages implement that. Then it should go into the
developers reference, and finally, migrate into the technical policy.
Starting with policy before the solution has been designed,
implemented, tested, and modified is not the right thing to do.
manoj
--
Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old
ones.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--- End Message ---
