Hello Russ, Russ Allbery schrieb am Sat 05. Jul, 13:50 (-0700): > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think we can add wording that says that these criteria are > > useful while trying to decide whether a package should be made > > Essential or not. Once it is Essential, then all bets are off, and > > packages are, in effect, never removed from the set, unless > > extraordinary effort is undertaken by someone. > > Here's a proposed clarification of the current Policy language around > Essential. Comments, feedback, seconds? > > The first part of the diff cuts out of the footnote some things that are > moved into the main Policy text in the second part of the diff. > > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index c9bd84f..d0dc2dc 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -985,29 +985,23 @@
Sounds good. I second this patch. Bye, Jörg. -- Prof. in der Mathematikvorlesung zu einem vergessenen φ in der Gleichung: „Klein‐φ macht auch Mist.“
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
