-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved through >> different approach? > > > While you're technically right, apparently, I think that this issue > should be solved by a discussion to either adapt the policy wrt > current practice (font servers are rather odd in these days of > mobility) or delay the solution to this after the release. > > The point is basically: we perfectly live with this "problem" for > years, so do we really want to delay the release by adding 93 RC bugs > for something that is basically cosmetic while we have a pile of RC > bugs that aren't cosmetic and are already delaying the release? I think that of course, no. I don't want to delay Lenny release in any way.
Julien Cristau has mentioned that policy 11.8.5 talks about only server-side packages and not TrueType (and some others?). In this case there is no problem at all and I can only suggest to add a note to policy to specify this more explicitly. Sorry for noise. - -- Regards, Eugene V. Lyubimkin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh9yfEACgkQchorMMFUmYzjpQCfXJ5MtxbnlKDQiqRHzc8d7809 zSkAn0Zdh6ujJMV7HKnQmApJBQkfxO1B =OlDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
