Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:58:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> THanks, I could come up with a transition plan myself if needed. But
>> compare your suggestions with: "someone goes over all init scripts, file
>> bugs and in lenny+1 we're done".
>
> That'll cause tremendous pain for backporters. I'm opposed.
My main idea (with or without trasition plan) is to have an option (for
example --no-oknodo) in lenny allowing maintainer to tell he wants the
current behavior of start-stop-deamon.
Whether warning are generated or not, bugs filled or not, lintian complains
or not, default behavior changed or not, ... is not really important for my
point of view (and can be decided after lenny) *iff* the option already
exists in lenny (else, we will have to wait for lenny+1)
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial pacakges: http://www-id.imag.fr/~danjean/deb.html#package
APT repo: deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
