Hi, what's the current public opinion on this? The responses I got in November 2006[1] indicated that this metapackage is not desired and should not be re-added to the list - however it's still in widespread use...
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ for DEP in Provides Depends Recommends Suggests; do \ ] > echo -n "$DEP: "; grep-available -sPackage -F$DEP editor | wc -l; done ] Provides: 29 ] Depends: 8 ] Recommends: 2 ] Suggests: 8 Shall this be unified before Lenny, or may I safely tag #398752 wontfix for now? Regards, Jan [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/11/msg00637.html based on a thread shortly before: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/11/msg00483.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
