On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:08:46 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think recent discussion on the libtool list revealed that libtool
> used numbers for one of the signals that XSI doesn't allow you to use
> signals for (SIGPIPE, I think it was, but I didn't go check).
> Ironically, libtool uses numbers rather than names for portability;
> older shells don't support names.
>> I would certainly be more comfortable if we stick to POSIX (including
>> XSI) rather than just accepting any old number in trap.
> We discussed including all of XSI, but there's a pile of other stuff
> in XSI that I think we decided that dash didn't actually implement. I
> don't remember the details, though.
OK. I guess we can just say that the trap function will follow
XSI, perhaps with a special exemption for SIGPIPE?
Or is something else being planned?
manoj
--
I knew her before she was a virgin. Oscar Levant, on Doris Day
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
