On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:26:37PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'd love to see some sort of guideline for this so that we could make > incorporation of new licenses into Policy more objective in the future. > I do agree that either priorities or popcon installations or both should > be taken into account as well as sheer quantity of packages.
Ok, here's an idea for such a guideline:
For each packages with this license, compute max{1,log10(popcon)}. Sum
all those values. If the total is higher than the treshold, the license
should go in common-licenses.
"A package with this license" is a package which, when the license is
added, can use a link to common-licenses instead of quoting it. This
means packages which use a symbolic link for their
/usr/share/doc/package directory never count (because they aren't
quoting the license).
The treshold could be 20. This means in particular that 3 popular
packages, which will have a log10(popcon) between 5 and 6, is not
enough.
What do you think? Any comments are welcome. :-)
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
