* Mon 2007-12-03 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Could you confirm that the Arch repository is the correct location? >> baz register-archive http://arch.debian.org/arch/dbnpolicy/lenny/ >> Is this correct? > > Yes.
Ok. >> A wishlist: Could git be considered instead of baz, because git's >> development seems to advance fast and it would be more easy to use >> (just one "clone" command to get archive). > > > rapid development is not necessarily a positive; as long as a tool > ...Arch is in maintainence mode, and > security flaws would tend to get fixed, so it is not as if it is > abandoned upstream. > > > I am waiting for sub projects [support in git]... > independent repositories into a single package... > > It takes me about 6 months to get comfortable with a new VCS... That subproject support is now in git. The reason why I asked was that I found it a bit strange to switch to arch, which has log been superceded by the more recent DVCS programs (darcs, bzr, hr, git). Judging from the rapid growth of the git being used e.g. for Debian packaging projects, the git seems to be a good candidate. The git command line UI is not necessarily bet yet, but the documentation and features really excel in many areas. It's more easier also to get git support than arch nowadays. Jari -- Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
