On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:21:10 -0500, Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:34:28PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> In addition to that, just some tiny nitpicking below. [...]
> I had the same initial reaction, but when I re-read Manoj's
> introduction, I think he suggests that this docbook format should be
> the *output* of an XSLT tool; the various policies would be encoded as
> individual XML entities with a more semantically appropriate schema
> (TBD, I guess).
You give me too much credit :-)
I was not thinking of this as an output; though if there are
more semantically appropriate schemas for a rule, then I would
appreciate people presenting them here; I am not wedded to the draft
format in any way. I confess I spent only about 30 minutes to an hour
drawing up the draft, so if people treat it as a strawman proposal to
be knocked down by a better schema, the better for us, I say.
manoj
--
It takes all kinds to fill the freeways. Crazy Charlie
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
