reassign 447231 debian-policy,python-defaults thanks [adding the debian-python list again, I guess you've missed it].
Matthias Klose wrote: > Bernd Zeimetz writes: >> Then let's maintain it again. We maintain a lot of packages in a team, >> so I can't see a problem to maintain the policy there, too. > > The policy files are not unmaintained; They are. Maintaining is more than having a minimal update every other year. > proposed policy changes should > be filed as bug reports against python-defaults. If that's the preferred way - I'm reassigning a related bug from d-policy to d-policy AND python-defaults to make sure it's not forgotten. Also in my opinion the Python policy should be team-maintained (preferable by a small and _active_ team) like most Python related packages. Manoj's Python 'policy' is much more complete, formal and uptodate then the official one, so it should replace the current one. -- Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bzed.de/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
