Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador dijo [Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:53:56PM -0300]:
>> >> There is no technical reason why this has to be a makefile. I propose:
>> >
>> > What is the use case of the change? I already see enough "bad code"
>> > right now, and it would only get worse if people start to write their
>> > make file in lets say ruby.
>>
>> While I agree with you that majority of people might do bad code I
>> also think that some very complicated packages (OO, X, Kernel and
>> like) can use it and make maintainers life easier.
>
> Maybe we should keep a recommendation for people to write makefiles,
> for ease of maintainability - but we should not keep it as a
> requeriment.
Yes, I agree on that :-)
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
