Russ Allbery wrote:
Here is a proposed wording patch. Unless there are any objections, I'll
commit this to my repository.
--- orig/policy.sgml
+++ mod/policy.sgml
@@ -8653,8 +8653,8 @@
<p>
Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic
- license, the GNU GPL, and the GNU LGPL, should refer to the
- corresponding files under
+ license, the GNU GPL, the GNU LGPL, and the GNU FDL should refer
+ to the corresponding files under
<file>/usr/share/common-licenses</file>,<footnote>
<p>
For example,
@@ -8665,9 +8665,7 @@
<file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>,
<file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2</file>, and
<file>/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1</file>, and so
- on. Note that the GFDL is new here, and the license file
- may not yet be in place in
- <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>.
+ on.
</p>
</footnote> rather than quoting them in the copyright
file.
I think we should add also the license version in the first paragraph,
as is stated in the second part, not to confuse users.
+ license, the GNU GPL (v. 2), the GNU LGPL (v. 2 and v. 2.1), and the
GNU FDL should refer
+ to the corresponding files under
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
