On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:02:56AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well It is two week now, and I did not get a single answer. Should I > > consider that as a nihil obstat ? > > Sorry about this. Figuring out how to move forward with Policy was the > topic of much discussion at DebConf, but also since both Manoj and I are > here and pretty busy with talks, I hadn't had a chance to look at the > mailing list much. > > I think this proposal has definitely had sufficient discussion, and the > impression that I had was that it had reached consensus. Given that, I > see no reason for it to not go into the next version of Policy.
So I consider the proposal accepted and I will prepare the changes to the menu package. Then I will upload menu 2.1.35 and send an summary of packages changes to debian-devel-announce. > We're going to start using a new Policy process (Manoj is going to send > out a writeup), and I'm not sure if we want to start that for the next > release or do one final cleanup release with some obvious pending stuff > and then start. I personally think I'd prefer the latter, including this, > probably the parallel build language, and a few other things that had > already been discussed and which are basically done. The menu sub-policy has always been sort of a special case anyway. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
