On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:42:45PM +0100, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:15:28AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > I would drop that "special" case and always require explicit > > requirement for the shell. It's more clear to see which packages > > "need" bash to make them work. someone may then provide a patch to > > "make bash go away". I suggest removing the last 2 lines: > > Personnally I rather look forward for the day where the use of shells > for non-interactive task is deprecated in Debian.
What would you like instead ? perl ? python ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
