> Why not ls? Judging by the lack of wishlist bugs requesting it and my own feeling of revulsion at the idea, I'd say that it's because no one wants it.
A builtin ls might be a good idea for disaster recovery shells, though zsh-static does not have it. posh is not intended to be such a shell, nor to be particularly useful interactively. Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value. If you disagree, feel free to file a bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
